1. distribution of retained earnings (TOP 2) | ||||
| votes | | percentage | |
| ||||
voting presence less abstentions | ,/, | 6,168,724 425 | | |
| ||||
votes cast less „NAYS” | ,/, | 6,168,299 38,626 | = = | 100.00 0.63 |
| ||||
number of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,129,673 | = | 99.37 |
| ||||
| ||||
2. discharge of the Board menbers (TOP 3) | ||||
| votes | | percentage | |
| ||||
voting presence less abstentions | ,/, | 6,168,724 1,995 | | |
| ||||
votes cast less „NAYS” | ,/, | 6,166,279 5,126 | = = | 100.00 0.08 |
| ||||
number of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,161,603 | = | 99.92 |
| ||||
| ||||
3. discharge of the Board of Directors (TOP 4) | ||||
| votes | | percentage | |
| ||||
voting presence less abstentions | ,/, | 6,168,724 2,130 | | |
| ||||
votes cast less „NAYS” | ,/, | 6,166,594 4,633 | = = | 100.00 0.08 |
| ||||
number of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,161,961 | = | 99.92 |
| ||||
| ||||
4. election of balance sheet auditor for the 2009/2010 business year (TOP 5) | ||||
| votes | | percentage | |
| ||||
voting presence less abstentions | ,/, | 6,168,724 313 | | |
| ||||
votes cast less „NAYS” | ,/, | 6,168,411 2,780 | = = | 100.00 0.05 |
| ||||
number of votes cast for the Supervisory board nomination | = | 6,165,631 | = | 99.95 |
| ||||
| ||||
5. election of the balance-sheet auditor for reviewing the semi-annual financial report for the 2009/2010 business year (TOP 6) | ||||
| votes | | percentage | |
| ||||
voting presence less abstentions | ,/, | 6,168,724 313 | | |
| ||||
votes cast less „NAYS” | ,/, | 6,168,411 2,780 | = = | 100.00 0.05 |
| ||||
number of votes cast for the Supervisory board nomination | = | 6,165,631 | = | 99.95 |
| ||||
| ||||
6. election of the Board of Directors (TOP 7) | ||||
| votes | | percentage | |
| ||||
voting presence less abstentions | ,/, | 6,168,724 3,441 | | |
| ||||
votes cast less „NAYS” | ,/, | 6,165,283 46,450 | = = | 100.00 0.75 |
| ||||
number of votes cast for the Supervisory board nomination | = | 6,118,833 | = | 99.25 |
| ||||
| ||||
7. Satzungsänderung zur Anpassung an ARUG (TOP 8) | ||||
| votes | | percentage | |
| ||||
voting presence less abstentions | ,/, | 6,168,724 298 | | |
| ||||
votes cast less „NAYS” | ,/, | 6,168,426 10,091 | = = | 100.00 0.16 |
| ||||
number of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,158,335 | = | 99.84 |
|
8. Satzungsänderung zur Anpassung an § 25 (TOP 9) | ||||
| votes | | percentage | |
| ||||
voting presence less abstentions | ,/, | 6,168,724 498 | | |
| ||||
votes cast less „NAYS” | ,/, | 6,168,226 3,430 | = = | 100.00 0.06 |
| ||||
number of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,164,796 | = | 99.94 |
9. repurchase of shares (TOP 10) | ||||
| votes | | percentage | |
| ||||
voting presence less abstentions | ,/, | 6,168,724 1,248 | | |
| ||||
votes cast less „NAYS” | ,/, | 6,167,476 19,970 | = = | 100.00 0.32 |
| ||||
number of votes cast for the administrative proposal | = | 6,147,506 | = | 99.68 |